Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G on one side and the Intel Core i7-1165G7 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4.4GHz. The second is used on the ultrabook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Ultrabook | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen 3 | Willow Cove | ||||||
Core name | Cezanne | Tiger Lake-UP3 | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 5 5000 | Core i7-1100 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | 100-000000252 | FH8069004530104, SRK02 | ||||||
Release date | 2021 Q2 | 2020 Q3 | ||||||
Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 10 nm SuperFin | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3.9 GHz | 1.2 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 16 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 28 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | - | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | ||||||
GPU cores | 7 | - | ||||||
GPU execution units | - | 96 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 448 | 768 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 1900 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1900 MHz | 1300 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 1,434 GFLOPS | 1,690 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | AM4 | BGA1449 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | - | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
AI accelerator | - | Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost | ||||||
Crypto engine | Advanced Encryption Standard instructions | AES New Instructions | ||||||
Security | Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection | OS Guard, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 585 | 428 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 4,526 | 2,357 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 217 | 215 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1,733 | 814 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 563 | 568 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 4,502 | 2,042 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1,493 | 1,502 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 11,187 | 4,723 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 3,195 | 2,205 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 19,971 | 10,493 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 6,449 | 6,367 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 32,341 | 20,188 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 1,460 | 1,421 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 7,228 | 4,598 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 528 GFLOPS | 316.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 498 pts / W | 721 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600G has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-1165G7 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-1165G7 is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 585 4,526 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 428 2,357 |
In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 92%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 217 1,733 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 215 814 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 113%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 563 4,502 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 568 2,042 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 120%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 1,493 11,187 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 1,502 4,723 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 137%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 3,195 19,971 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 2,205 10,493 |
In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 90%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 6,449 32,341 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 6,367 20,188 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 60%.
On Linux 64-bit:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 6,813 32,540 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 6,877 19,876 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 64%.
On Android 64-bit:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 4,971 18,713 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 5,924 18,450 |
In single core, the difference is -16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 1,460 7,228 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 1,421 4,598 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 57%.
On Linux:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 1,484 6,837 |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | 1,420 4,422 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-1165G7 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 5600AMD Ryzen 5 5600GEAMD Ryzen 5 5600HAMD Ryzen 5 5600HSAMD Ryzen 5 5600UAMD Ryzen 5 5600X