A constitution can be either unitary or federal. A unitary system is governed constitutionally as one single unit, with one constitutionally created legislature. but in the federal constitution, there is a division of powers between the federal and the state governments. Here are some differences between the federal government and the unitary government.
Federal government
Unitary government
The system has multiple hierarchy levels, with both the central authority and the states (or provinces) both being sovereign.
There is no hierarchy of sovereign powers.
The central or national rules override the state rules.
States have no authority to pass their own laws, and the central or national government can order the states to do anything.
There is a balance between the levels of government.
The federal government has a huge percentage of power. Examples include Japan and Saudi Arabia.
Power and responsibilities are shared between national and local levels.
Power is placed in one central governing system
Articles to Explore:
Was this answer helpful?
4 (554)
Thank you. Your Feedback will Help us Serve you better.
In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
By definition the difference between a confederation and a federation is that the membership of the member states in a confederation is voluntary, while the membership in a federation is not.
Sometimes confederation is erroneously used in the place of federation. Some nations which started out as confederations retained the word in their titles after officially becoming federations, such as Switzerland. The United States of America was a confederation before it became a federation with the ratification of the current U.S. constitution in 1788.
| Held by the member states. In a Confederation, the federal government is accountable to the member states, who are the ultimate authority. | Held by the federal government. In a Federation, the federal government will hold the ultimate authority and the member states will be subordinate to it. |
| The central authority of a confederation is usually a weak body appointed by the member states. | The central authority of a federation is a federal government which governs the member states. |
| Usually will focus on joint foreign policy and defense matters, but rarely will have the power to do much more than that. | Determined by the constitution of the federation, but will generally have rights to exercise control over the diplomatic, military, economic, and legal spheres of the member states. |
| Toltec Empire, League of Mayapan, Crown of Aragon, Confederation of Madya-as, Old Swiss Confederacy, New England Confederation, Aro Confederacy, United States of America (1781-1789), Confederation of the Rhine and many more | Canada, United States of America, Mexico, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Estonia, Russia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Malaysia, Australia, Sudan, and many more |
- Follow
- Share
- Cite
- Authors
Share this comparison:
If you read this far, you should follow us:
"Confederation vs Federation." Diffen.com. Diffen LLC, n.d. Web. 22 Feb 2022. < >
One of the main distinction among types of governments is between unitary and federal systems. Both systems can refer to democratic or monarchic governments, but they are intrinsically different. As the name suggests, the unitary government entails the centralization of power in the hands of the central government, which does not delegate tasks and responsibilities to other members of the state. Conversely, in a federal system, regions and provinces enjoy a higher degree of autonomy. In today’s world, we see various examples of both systems working and ensuring stability and prosperity. For instance, the United States and Switzerland are two examples of the efficiency of the federal system (while in Sudan and Pakistan such system is not as efficient), whereas Italy and Norway have successful unitary governments. To date, most governments are unitary, while there are currently 27 federal systems.
What is Unitary Government?
A unitary government can be both a democracy and a monarchy. In both cases, the power is concentrated in the hands of the central government, while provinces and regions do not enjoy large autonomy. The underlying principle of any unitary government is the idea of unity. If the power is in the hands of few (even if those few are elected by the population), it is easier to create cohesive and equal laws and norms that apply to all citizens (in all parts of the country) without discrimination.
Some believe that citizens do not have much say in unitary systems, but this is not always true. In unitary democracies, like Italy, South Korea, Portugal, France and Finland, citizens have the right to express their opinions and the government is elected by the people. Even in monarchic systems like Spain, Sweden and Denmark, the interests of the population are always taken in high consideration. Freedom of speech and liberty of movements are (or should be) always respected in such countries and citizens have the possibility to protest against their government if they wish so. Yet, at the same time, it is easier for a unitary government to turn into an authoritarian regime or a dictatorship, and rulers have the possibility of creating and eliminating rules and laws in a much quicker way than in a federal system.
What is Federal Government?
In a federal system, regions and provinces enjoy a higher degree of autonomy. The largest federation in the world is the United States. In this case, the 50 states enjoy autonomy and even have different laws and regulations on a number of matters. Yet, at the same time, they remain linked and subject to the decisions of the central government. In a federal system, provinces and regions have the possibility of creating laws and regulations that better capture the needs and unicity of specific areas.
Yet, some powers always remain in the hands of the central government, including:
- International diplomacy;
- Foreign affairs:
- Decision to start or end a war;
- National security;
- Taxes;
- National budget; and
- Immigration policies.
The link between local authorities and central government is usually very strong, although not all federal systems work in the same way. Of the 27 federations existing today, most are republics and democracies (i.e. United States, Switzerland, India, Brazil, etc.) but there are also some monarchies, such as Canada, Belgium and Australia.
Similarities between Unitary and Federal Government
Although the unitary and federal government are very different and are based on contrasting principles, we can identify few common aspects between the two systems:
1) The unitary and the federal government can be both monarchies and democracies. Although the unitary system is more suitable for a monarchy (the power is concentrated in the hands of the ruling family), most modern monarchies (i.e. United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, etc.) employ a federal system;
2) In both cases, the central government maintains control over key issues. Even in federations, in fact, the central government is in charge of international relations and diplomacy, taxes, budget allocation and national security; and
3)Both system can promote stability and prosperity. The unitary government does so by promoting equality and cohesion across the nation, while the federal government does so by promoting specific regulations that better capture local needs and that are more suitable for minority groups.
Difference between Unitary Government and Federal Government
The debate on unitary and federal governments has been explored by scholars and academics, and has been reinterpreted by Arend Lijphart who mainly focused on democratic systems, and analyzed the difference between Westminster and Consensus democracies.
The first term refers to the majoritarian model exemplified by the British parliamentary and governmental institutions. This system is based on the concentration of the executive power in the hands of one party, cabinet dominance, a majoritarian and disproportional system of elections, a unitary and centralized government, constitutional flexibility and the state’s control over the central bank.
Conversely, the second term refers to a different model of democracy characterized by executive power-sharing in broad coalitions, a multiparty system, proportional representations, federal and decentralized government, constitutional rigidity, and an independent central bank. And that is, therefore, more adapt for heterogeneous societies. In other words, Lijphart analyzed the difference between unitary and federal democracies. If we broaden the scope of the comparison, we can identify more differences between the two:
1) Efficiency of Unitary Government and Federal Government: some believe that a unitary and cohesive country is more efficient and that a centralized government is able to make decisions and implement laws and regulations in a more effective manner. At the same time, others argue that a decentralized system can respond to the needs of all citizens in a more adequate way. Indeed, in unitary systems, the decision-making process is faster and (often) smoother, but, at the same time, there might be less transparency. Unitary governments do not have duplications (whereas federal systems do) and reduce bureaucratic and administrative processes to the minimum. Conversely, federal systems tend to take longer to make decisions, to adopt or reject new laws, and to implement political and social changes;
2) Participation of Unitary vs. Federal Government: in a unitary democracy (as well as in some modern monarchies), citizens have the possibility of electing their representatives and popular participation is allowed and promoted by the government itself. Yet, federal systems allow for a broader popular engagement. For instance, in most federal republics, citizens can elect their representatives at a local and state level but can also participate in the election of the president or head of the state;
3) “Involvement in the economy” of Unitary and Federal Government: the degree of governmental involvement in the economy varies from country to country. In some cases, federal systems allow for more autonomy even in the economic sphere, while on other cases the central government uses its local subsidiaries to keep a closer look on private businesses. In general, private entrepreneurship tends to be more challenging in unitary states.
Unitary vs Federal Government: Comparison chart
Building on the differences outlined in the previous section, we can identify few other aspects that differentiate federal and unitary governments.
Summary of Unitary vs. Federal Government
Federal and unitary governments are two of the most common ways in which countries can be organized. While in a unitary system the power is concentrated in the hands of the central government, in a federal system power and authorities are shared among central, regional and local authorities. The two systems are based on different principles. The unitary government aims at creating a cohesive and unified country, whereas the federal system creates laws and regulations that better capture the needs and interests of local communities. Both federal and unitary governments can be either democracies or monarchies, although the unitary system is often associated with a more authoritarian type of governance, while the federal system is often associated with democratic ideals. Today, most countries have unitary governments but there are 27 federal governments all across the world, with the United States being the most famous example.
Help us improve. Rate this post!