1. Williams V, Price J, Hardinge M, Tarassenko L, Farmer A. Using a mobile health application to support self-management in COPD: A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64:e392–400. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Wackerbarth SB, Tarasenko YN, Joyce JM, Haist SA. Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: An examination based on informed decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:43–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Egbunike JN, Shaw C, Porter A, Button LA, Kinnersley P, Hood K, et al. Streamline triage and manage user expectations: Lessons from a qualitative study of GP out-of-hours services. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e83–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Khandaker GM, Gandamaneni PK, Dibben CR, Cherukuru S, Cairns P, Ray MK. Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: A qualitative study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19:298–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Mangione-Smith R, Schiff J, Dougherty D. Identifying children's health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: An evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11:S11–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Hess R, Santucci A, McTigue K, Fischer G, Kapoor W. Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:476–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:223–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG. Vol. 4. Sage Publications; 2011. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research; pp. 97–128. [Google Scholar]
10. CASP. CASP Qualitative Checklist: Critical Appraisal Skills Program. 2013. [Last cited on 2015 Mar 01]. Available from: //www.media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_29c5b002d99342f788c6ac670e49f274.pdf .
11. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322:1115–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:341–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Sale JE. How to assess rigour…or not in qualitative papers. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14:912–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Meyrick J. What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:799–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Kitto SC, Chesters J, Grbich C. Quality in qualitative research. Med J Aust. 2008;188:243–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Waterman AS. The humanistic psychology-positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. Am Psychol. 2013;68:124–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Finfgeld-Connett D. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66:246–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013:1–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Coyne IT. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:623–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Becker PH. Common pitfalls in published grounded theory research. Qual Health Res. 1993;3:254–60. [Google Scholar]
21. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications; 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry; p. 416. [Google Scholar]
22. Rodgers BL, Cowles KV. The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Res Nurs Health. 1993;16:219–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Kahn DL. Reducing bias. In: Cohen MZ, Kahn DL, Steeves RH, editors. Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research: A Practical Guide for Nurse Researchers. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications; 2000. pp. 85–99. [Google Scholar]
24. Carcary M. The research audit trail – Enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 03];Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2009 7:11–24. Available from: //www.ejbrm.com . [Google Scholar]
25. Jansen H. The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010;11:2. [Google Scholar]
26. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Newbury Park; London: Sage; 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. [Google Scholar]
27. George M, Apter AJ. Gaining insight into patients’ beliefs using qualitative research methodologies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;4:185–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Grossoehme DH. Overview of qualitative research. J Health Care Chaplain. 2014;20:109–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Silverman D. 3rd ed. Newbury Park, London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009. Doing Qualitative Research; p. 472. [Google Scholar]
30. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:1189–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Allmark P. Popper and nursing theory. Nurs Philos. 2003;4:4–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Newbury Park, London: Sage; 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. [Google Scholar]
33. Trochim WM. Cincinnati, Ohio: Atomic Dog Publishing; 2005. Research Methods: The Concise Knowledge Base. [Google Scholar]
34. Zimmer L. Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:311–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res. 1968;17:364. [Google Scholar]
36. Van Manen M. New York: SUNY Press: Suny Press; 1990. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for An Action Sensitive Pedagogy. [Google Scholar]
37. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Newbury Park, London: Sage; 1988. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. [Google Scholar]
38. Gadamer HG. Truth and Method. In: Weinsheimer J, Marshall DG, editors. New York: Continuum; 1989. [Google Scholar]
39. Thompson J. Advancing Nursing Science Through Research. Vol. 2. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications; 1990. Hermeneutic inquiry; pp. 223–86. [Google Scholar]
40. Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Andrews J, et al. Trying to pin down jelly – Exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:304–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Reasserting realism in qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60:79–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications; 1989. Fourth Generationm Evaluation; p. 296. [Google Scholar]
44. Sparkes AC. Myth 94: Qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qual Health Res. 2001;11:538–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]