A learner who has a moderately strong degree of self efficacy for solving math problems will likely

1. Mega C, Ronconi L, De Beni R. What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. J Educ Psychol. 2014;106(1):121.

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ. Second-year medical students’ motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievement. Med Educ. 2010;44(12):1203–12.

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Sagheb MM, Amini M, Saber M, Moghadami M, Nabiei P, Khalili R, et al. Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) to Undergraduate Medical Students through Flipped Classroom Approach. Shiraz E-Med J. 2018;19(2):1–6.

4. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP. Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol. 2002;37(2):91–105.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Frenzel AC, Barchfeld P, Perry RP. Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: the achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemp Educ Psychol. 2011;36(1):36–48.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Ngwira FF, Gu C, Mapoma HWT, Kondowe W. The role of academic emotions on medical and allied health students’ motivated self-regulated learning strategies. J Contemp Med Edu. 2017;5(1):23.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Galindo-Garré F, Ten Cate O. Motivational profiles of medical students: association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(1):87.

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Kramarski B, Mevarech ZR, Arami M. The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educ Stud Math. 2002;49(2):225–50.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Sadi O, Uyar M. The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies And Achievement: A Path Model. J Baltic Sci Educ. 2013;12(1):21–33.

10. Pekrun R, Elliot AJ, Maier MA. Achievement goals and achievement emotions: testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. J Educ Psychol. 2009;101(1):115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Vierhaus M, Lohaus A, Wild E. The development of achievement emotions and coping/emotion regulation from primary to secondary school. Learn Instr. 2016;42:12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Vermunt JD. Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. High Educ. 2005;49(3):205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. May W, Chung E-K, Elliott D, Fisher D. The relationship between medical students’ learning approaches and performance on a summative high-stakes clinical performance examination. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e236–e41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Artino AR Jr, Holmboe ES, Durning SJ. Control-value theory: using achievement emotions to improve understanding of motivation, learning, and performance in medical education: AMEE guide no. 64. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):e148–e60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Govaerts S, Grégoire J. Development and construct validation of an academic emotions scale. Int J Test. 2008;8(1):34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature. 2010;466(7302):29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Pekrun R. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educ Psychol Rev. 2006;18(4):315–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Villavicencio FT, Bernardo AB. Negative emotions moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and achievement of Filipino students. Psychol Stud. 2013;58(3):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Goetz T, Pekrun R, Hall N, Haag L. Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. Br J Educ Psychol. 2006;76(2):289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Meinhardt J, Pekrun R. Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: an ERP study. Cogn Emot. 2003;17(3):477–500.

21. Chin EC, Williams MW, Taylor JE, Harvey ST. The influence of negative affect on test anxiety and academic performance: an examination of the tripartite model of emotions. Learn Individ Differ. 2017;54:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Worth Publisher; 1997.

23. Schunk DH, Ertmer PA. Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. Handbook Self-Regul Elsevier. 2000:631–49.

24. Pintrich PR. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. J Educ Psychol. 2003;95(4):667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Kurbanoglu NI, Akim A. The relationships between university students’ chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes, and self-efficacy beliefs. Aust J Teach Educ. 2010;35(8):4.

26. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Chemers MM, Hu L-t, Garcia BF. Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. J Educ Psychol. 2001;93(1):55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Alyami M, Melyani Z, Al Johani A, Ullah E, Alyami H, Sundram F, et al. The impact of self-esteem, academic self-efficacy and perceived stress on academic performance: a cross-sectional study of Saudi psychology students. Eur J Educ Sci (EJES). 2017;4(3):51–68.

    Google Scholar 

29. Ferla J, Valcke M, Cai Y. Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: reconsidering structural relationships. Learn Individ Differ. 2009;19(4):499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Putwain D, Sander P, Larkin D. Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. Br J Educ Psychol. 2013;83(4):633–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Doménech-Betoret F, Abellán-Roselló L, Gómez-Artiga A. Self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement: the mediator role of Students' expectancy-value beliefs. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Aurah CM. The effects of self-efficacy beliefs and metacognition on academic performance: a mixed method study. Am J Educ Res. 2013;1(8):334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Ganda DR, Boruchovitch E, editors. Promoting self-regulated learning of Brazilian Preservice student Teachers: results of an intervention Program. Frontiers in Education; 2018: Frontiers.

34. Şen Ş. Modeling The Structural Relations Among Learning Strategies, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, And Effort Regulation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2016;71.

35. Pintrich PR, De Groot EV. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82(1):33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Sungur S, Kahraman N. The contribution of motivational beliefs to students' metacognitive strategy use. Egitim Ve Bilim. 2011;36(160):3.

    Google Scholar 

37. Sen S, Yilmaz A. Devising a structural equation model of relationships between Preservice Teachers' time and study environment management, effort regulation, self-efficacy, control of learning beliefs, and metacognitive self-regulation. Sci Educ Int. 2016;27(2):301–16.

    Google Scholar 

38. Zimmerman BJ. Motivational Sources and Outcomes of Self-Regulated Learning and Performance: Graduate Center of City University of New York. Handbook Self-Regul Learn Perform Routledge. 2011:63–78.

39. Pekrun R, Stephens EJ. Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010;4(4):238–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Pekrun R, Frenzel AC, Goetz T, Perry RP. The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. Emotion Educ Elsevier. 2007:13–36.

41. Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: the emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educ Psychol Rev. 1990;2(2):173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Tembo LH, Ngwira FF. The impact of self-efficacy beliefs on learning strategies: towards learning Human Anatomy at College of Medicine. J Contemp Med Edu. 2016;4(1):1–7.

43. Pintrich PR. A process-oriented view of student motivation and cognition. New Dir Inst Res. 1988;1988(57):65–79.

    Google Scholar 

44. Pintrich PR, Smith DA, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ Psychol Meas. 1993;53(3):801–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Sungur S. Modeling the relationships among students' motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scand J Educ Res. 2007;51(3):315–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. Ahmed W, Van der Werf G, Kuyper H, Minnaert A. Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: a growth curve analysis. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(1):150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

47. Yang M. Investigating the structure and the pattern in self-regulated learning by high school students. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2005;6(2):162–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. King RB, Areepattamannil S. What students feel in school influences the strategies they use for learning: academic emotions and cognitive/meta-cognitive strategies. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2014;8(1):18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. Violato C, Hecker KG. How to use structural equation modeling in medical education research: a brief guide. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19(4):362–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling Guilford. N Y. 2005;1–336.

51. RCM SM, Hair JF. In: Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, editors. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Cham: Handbook of Market Research Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

52. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

53. Pintrich PR. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Int J Educ Res. 1999;31(6):459–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Page 2