Every one of these skills should be explored and understood. Writing about one or all of them can take place during essays and papers. If you haven't touched on any then you've written circular paper or statements. Remember to use these while answering the prompt or question. These skills are explained below in further depth.
9. Argumentation Historical thinking involves the ability to create an argument and support it using relevant historical evidence. Creating a historical argument includes defining and framing a question about the past and then formulating a claim or argument about that questions, often in the form of a thesis. A persuasive historical argument requires a precise and defensible thesis or claim, supported by rigorous analysis of relevant and diverse historical evidence. The argument and evidence used should be framed around the application of a specific historical thinking skill (e.g., comparison, causation, patterns of continuity and change over time, or periodization). Furthermore, historical thinking involves the ability to examine multiple pieces of evidence in concert with each other, noting contradictions, corroborations, and other relationships among sources to develop and support an argument.
The Historical Thinking Project works with six distinct but closely interrelated historical thinking concepts. To think historically, students need to be able to:
Taken together, these concepts tie “historical thinking” to competencies in “historical literacy.” In this case, “historical literacy” means gaining a deep understanding of historical events and processes through active engagement with historical texts. Historically literate citizens can assess the legitimacy of claims that there was no Holocaust, that slavery wasn't so bad for African-Americans, that aboriginal rights have a historical basis, and that the Russian experience in Afghanistan serves as a warning to the Canadian mission there. They have thoughtful ways to tackle these debates. They can interrogate historical sources. They know that a historical film can look "realistic" without being accurate. They understand the value of a footnote. In short, they can detect the differences, as Margaret MacMillan's book title reads, between the uses and abuses of history. “Historical thinking” only becomes possible in relation to substantive content. These concepts are not abstract “skills.” Rather, they provide the structure that shapes the practice of history.
🏠 Home➗ Math🧪 Science🏛️ History📺 Arts & Humanities🤝 Social Studies💻 Engineering & Technology💰 Business📚 Other📓 Study Guides🏆 Leaderboard💯 All Tags❓ Unanswered🔀 Random Critical Thinking |