Which point should the nurse emphasize when educating older adults about memory and cognition?

  1. Yip W, Hsiao WC. The Chinese health system at a crossroads. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(2):460–8. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.460.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. China Statistical Yearbook. National Bureau Statistics of China. 2018 [cited 25 January 2019]. Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2018/indexeh.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Word Population Ageing 2017-Highlights. 2017. (ST/ESA/SER.A/397).

  4. Berlau DJ, Corrada MM, Kawas C. The prevalence of disability in the oldest-old is high and continues to increase with age: findings from the 90+ study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(11):121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs JM, Maaravi Y, Cohen A, Bursztyn M, Ein-Mor E, Stessman J. Changing profile of health and function from age 70 to 85 years. Gerontology. 2012;58(4):313–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nie JX, Wang L, Tracy CS, Moineddin R, Upshur RE. Health care service utilization among the elderly: findings from the study to understand the chronic condition experience of the elderly and the disabled (SUCCEED project). J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(6):1044–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00952.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilpert S, Ruedin HJ, Trueb L, Monod-Zorzi S, Yersin B, Bula C. Emergency department use by oldest-old patients from 2005 to 2010 in a Swiss university hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Meijer C, Koopmanschap M, TB DU, van Doorslaer E. Determinants of long-term care spending: age, time to death or disability? J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):425–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerdtham UG. The impact of aging on health care expenditure in Sweden. Health Policy. 1993;24(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(93)90083-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Z, Norton EC, Stearns SC. Longevity and health care expenditures: the real reasons older people spend more. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58(1):S2–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.1.S2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Crimmins EM, Saito Y. Getting better and getting worse: transitions in functional status among older Americans. J Aging Health. 1993;5(1):3–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/089826439300500101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lau RS, Johnson S, Kamalanabhan TJ. Healthy life expectancy in the context of population health and ageing in India. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24(1):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539510376663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynch SM, Brown JS, Taylor MG. Demography of disability. In: Uhlenberg P, editor. International handbook of population aging. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 567–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3_25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaupel JW. Biodemography of human ageing. Nature. 2010;464(7288):536–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08984.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakari R. Mobility and its decline in old age: determinants and associated factors: University of Jyväskylä; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng Y, Hesketh T. The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 2016;388(10054):1930–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31405-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Han L, Feng Q, Dupre ME, Gu D, Allore HG, et al. Are China’s oldest-old living longer with less disability? A longitudinal modeling analysis of birth cohorts born 10 years apart. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1259-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo J, Ho SC, Yuen YK, Yu LM, Lau J. An estimation of the functional disability burden in elderly Chinese age 70 years and over. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(12):609–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289609166322.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giles LC, Cameron ID, Crotty M. Disability in older Australians: projections for 2006-2031. Med J Aust. 2003;179(3):130–3. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05470.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanewald K, Li H, Shao AW. Modelling multi-state health transitions in China: a generalised linear model with time trends. Ann Actuarial Sci. 2019;13(1):145–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499518000167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rickayzen BD, Walsh DEP. A multi-state model of disability for the United Kingdom: implications for future need for long-term care for the elderly. Br Actuar J. 2002;8(2):341–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321700003755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu HM, Yang SS, Gao JW, Zhou LY, Liang RF, Qu CY. Multi-state Markov model in outcome of mild cognitive impairments among community elderly residents in mainland China. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(5):797–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610212002220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu B. Projecting future demand for informal care among older people in China: the road towards a sustainable long-term care system. Health Econ Policy Law. 2019;14(1):61–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133118000221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weintraub S, Wicklund AH, Salmon DP. The neuropsychological profile of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(4):a006171. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Oros RI, Popescu CA, Iova CA, Mihancea P, Iova SO. The impact of cognitive impairment after stroke on activities of daily living. HVM Int J Bioflux Soc. 2016;8(1):41–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ansah JP, Malhotra R, Lew N, Chiu C-T, Chan A, Bayer S, et al. Projection of young-old and old-old with functional disability: does accounting for the changing educational composition of the elderly population make a difference? PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126471.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ansah JP, Koh V, Chiu C-T, Chei C-L, Zeng Y, Yin Z-X, et al. Projecting the number of elderly with cognitive impairment in China using a multi-state dynamic population model. Syst Dyn Rev. 2017;33(2):89–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state” a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Katzman R, Zhang M, Ouang Ya Q, Wang Z, Liu WT, Yu E, et al. A Chinese version of the mini-mental state examination; impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):971–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90034-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922–35–35–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Banister J, Hill K. Mortality in China 1964-2000. Popul Stud (Camb). 2004;58(1):55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472032000183753 PMID: 15204262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gu D. General data quality assessment of the CLHLS. In: Yi Z, Poston DL, Vlosky DA, Gu D, editors. Healthy longevity in China: demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological dimensions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2008. p. 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6752-5_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Kryscio RJ, Schmitt FA, Salazar JC, Mendiondo MS, Markesbery WR. Risk factors for transitions from normal to mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Neurology. 2006;66(6):828–32. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000203264.71880.45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tyas SL, Salazar JC, Snowdon DA, Desrosiers MF, Riley KP, Mendiondo MS, et al. Transitions to mild cognitive impairments, dementia, and death: findings from the Nun study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(11):1231–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cai L, Hayward M, Saito Y, Lubitz J, Hagedorn A, Crimmins E. Estimation of multi-state life table functions and their variability from complex survey data using the SPACE program. Demogr Res. 2010;22(6):129–58. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ansah JP, Matchar DB, Love SR, Malhotra R, Do YK, Chan A, et al. Simulating the impact of long-term care policy on family eldercare hours. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(2pt2):773–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu K, Manton KG, Aragon C. Changes in home care use by disabled elderly persons: 1982-1994. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000;55(4):S245–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/55.4.S245.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Spillman BC, Pezzin LE. Potential and active family caregivers: changing networks and the “sandwich generation”. Milbank Q. 2000;78(3):347–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu CY, Hu HY, Li CP, Fang YT, Huang N, Chou YJ. The association between functional disability and acute care utilization among the elderly in Taiwan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;57(2):177–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2013.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spillman BC. Changes in elderly disability rates and the implications for health care utilization and cost. Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):157–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00305.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Dai B, Mao Z, Mei J, Levkoff S, Wang H, Pacheco M, et al. Caregivers in China: knowledge of mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053928.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schulz R, Martire LM. Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2004;12(3):240–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019442-200405000-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kivipelto ME, Martín N, Eg JJ, et al. World Wide Fingers will advance dementia prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30431-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 


Page 2

Skip to main content

From: Trends in functional disability and cognitive impairment among the older adult in China up to 2060: estimates from a dynamic multi-state population model

  2015 2060 Annual relative change (%) Relative change (2015–2060)
All older adult
 Total older adult 159·07 (158·98–159·16) 439·34 (438·31–440·37) 3·92% (3·9–3·93) 176·1% (175·6–176·6)
 Older adult without impairment 141·15 (141·04–141·26) 343·16 (342·44–343·88) 3·18% (3·17–3·19) 143·1% (142·7–143·4)
 Older adult with impairment 17·920 (17·829–18·012) 96·184 (95·280–97·087) 9·71% (9·65–9·76) 436·7% (434·4–439)
 Fraction with impairment (%) 11·26% (11·21–11·32) 21·83% (21·66–22·00) 2.08%(2.07–2.09) 93.6%(93.15–94.05)
Female
 Total older adult 81·175 (81·108–81·242) 221·45 (220·78–222·13) 3·84% (3·83–3·85) 172·8% (172·2–173·4)
 Older adult without impairment 69·782 (69·709–69·856) 164·51 (164·09–164·93) 3·017% (3–3·025) 135·7% (135·4–136·1)
 Older adult with impairment 11·393 (11·331–11.455) 56.943 (56.384–57.502) 8.88% (8.84–8.93) 399.8% (397.6–401.9)
 Fraction with impairment (%) 14·03% (13·96–14·10) 25·62% (25·43–25·81) 1.84%(1.83–1.85) 82.61%(82.16–83.0)
Men
 Total older adult 77·90 (77·84–77·96) 217·88 (217·19–218·58) 3·99% (3·98–4·01) 179·6% (179–180·3)
 Older adult without impairment 71·376 (71·300–71·452) 178·64 (178·11–179·18) 3·34% (3·33–3·35) 150·2% (149·8–150·7)
 Older adult with impairment 6·527 (6·472–6·582) 39·241 (38·684–39·798) 11·14% (11·06–11·21) 501·2% (497·7–504·6)
 Fraction with impairment (%) 8·38% (8·31–8·45) 17·92% (17·71–18·14) 2.53%(2.51–2.55) 113.84%(113.12–114.67)