Amd ryzen 5 5600x vs intel i7

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 5600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 131 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600X.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  • Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - $156.99 vs $306.88

  • Up to 47% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-11700KF - $0.16 vs $0.3 per FPS

  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF

  • Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 5 5600X - 1037 vs 1001 FPS

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 16 vs 12 threads

Rocket League

TOP 5 Games

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

Intel Core i7-11700KF

Nov 5th, 2020 Release Date

Mar 16th, 2021

Ryzen 5 Collection Core i7
Vermeer Codename Rocket Lake
AMD Socket AM4 Socket Intel Socket 1200

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 Cores

8

12 Threads

16

3.7 GHz

Base Clock Speed 3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

5.0 GHz

65 W

TDP 125 W

7 nm

Process Size 14 nm

37.0x

Multiplier 36.0x
None Integrated Graphics None
Yes Overclockable Yes

Builds Using Ryzen 5 5600X or Core i7-11700KF

Rocket League, 1080p, High

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

GeForce RTX 3060

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, N/A Storage

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

GeForce RTX 3060

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, N/A Storage

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Core i7-11700KF

8 GB, N/A Storage

GeForce RTX 3080

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, N/A Storage

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Price now 233$

Games supported 100%

Price now 239$

Games supported 100%

Contents

General info

Comparing Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating 357 280
Place by popularity no data 17
Value for money 50.20 51.10
Market segment Desktop processor Desktop processor
Series no data AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codename Comet Lake-S (2020) Vermeer (Zen3) (2020)
Release date 30 April 2020 (2 years ago) 8 October 2020 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $400 $299
Current price $233 (0.6x MSRP) $239 (0.8x MSRP)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

Technical specs

Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores 8 (Octa-Core) 6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads 16 12
Base clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed 5.1 GHz 4.6 GHz
L1 cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 cache 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 cache 16 MB (shared) 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Die size no data 2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature 100 °C no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 95 °C
64 bit support + +
Windows 11 compatibility + +
Unlocked multiplier + +

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Socket FCLGA1200 AM4
Thermal design power (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI + +
AVX + +
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + no data
Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 no data
Hyper-Threading Technology + no data
TSX - no data
TSX + no data
Idle States + no data
Thermal Monitoring + no data
SIPP + no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 + no data

Security technologies

Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT + no data
EDB + no data
Secure Key + no data
Identity Protection + no data
SGX Yes with Intel® ME no data
OS Guard + no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V + +
VT-d + no data
VT-x + no data
EPT + no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size 128 GB 128 GB
Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 45.8 GB/s 51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support - -

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Intel UHD Graphics 630 -
Max video memory 64 GB -
Quick Sync Video + -
Clear Video + -
Clear Video HD + -
Graphics max frequency 1.2 GHz -
InTru 3D + -

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported 3 -

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support + -
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 4096 x 2160@30Hz -
Max resolution over eDP 4096 x 2304@60Hz -
Max resolution over DisplayPort 4096 x 2304@60Hz -

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X.

PCIe version 3.0 4.0
PCI Express lanes 16 no data

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 5600X 21.78

+14.6%

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • wPrime 32
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • TrueCrypt AES
  • WinRAR 4.0
  • x264 encoding pass 2
  • x264 encoding pass 1

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

Ryzen 5 5600X 21954

+14.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Ryzen 5 5600X 1612

+20.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Ryzen 5 5600X 13282

+56.8%

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 19.01 21.78
Recency 30 April 2020 8 October 2020
Cost $400 $299
Boost clock speed 5100 4600
Base clock speed 3800 3700
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-10700K and Ryzen 5 5600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.


Competitors of Core i7-10700K by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-10700K by AMD is Ryzen 5 5600GE, which is slower by 1% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i7-10700K:

Competitors of Ryzen 5 5600X by Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 5600X from Intel is Core i9-9900X, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 5600X:

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate Intel Core i7-10700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

Amd ryzen 5 5600x vs intel i7

Amd ryzen 5 5600x vs intel i7

Rate AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

Amd ryzen 5 5600x vs intel i7

Amd ryzen 5 5600x vs intel i7

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 5 5600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Is AMD Ryzen better than Intel i7?

Both the CPUs perform extremely well in terms of benchmarks but it is the Intel i7 that beats AMD Ryzen 7 5800X by a margin of up to 15-20% better performance.

What is better for gaming Intel i7 or Ryzen 5?

As you can see, Intel's Alder Lake chips are faster than AMD's Zen 3-powered Ryzen 5000 processors in all areas but one — the Ryzen 7 5800X3D that takes the overall lead in gaming.

Is Ryzen 5 equivalent to i7?

Their consumer-grade processors are Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7, and Ryzen 9. The Ryzen 3 corresponds to Intel Core i3, Ryzen 5 corresponds to Core i5, Ryzen 7 corresponds to Core i7, and Ryzen 9 corresponds to Core i9. It's because the corresponding processor is closely similar in terms of specs and performance.

Is Ryzen 5 5600X better than i5 12400?

The $192 Core i5-12400 beats the more expensive $299 Ryzen 5 5600X and $259 Ryzen 5 5600G in key areas. At stock settings, the Core i5-12400 is 1.9% faster than AMD's venerable ~$299 Ryzen 5 5600X in gaming, an impressive showing for a chip that costs $100 less.