Mazda cx-5 vs toyota rav4 2022

You’re looking at Australia’s two biggest-selling SUVs, the Toyota RAV4 and Mazda CX-5, both of which recently received some updates for the current model year.

For those after a medium SUV with some rugged design cues and class-leading fuel economy, there’s the newly launched RAV4 Edge spec level with variant-first two-motor hybrid drivetrain.

  • How much?

    This pair line up very closely on price, though not in terms of estimated delivery times.

    Mazda Australia is reporting comparatively brief wait times compared to the more supply constrained RAV4, buyers of which have been waiting up to a year.

    Mazda CX-5 Akera 2.5T

    • List price: $53,380
    • Drive-away*: $58,481

    Toyota RAV4 Edge Hybrid

    • List price: $52,700
    • Drive-away*: $57,773

    * Price based on a Melbourne postcode

    What do you get?

    Common features on the outside include 19-inch wheels with space-saver spares; LED headlights, tail lights and DRLs; auto-folding mirrors, a front-row sunroof, powered tailgates, and rain-sensing wipers. The Toyota adds roof rails.

    Mazda CX-5 AkeraToyota RAV4 Edge
    Wheels 19-inch 19-inch
    Spare tyre Temporary Temporary
    Headlights LED LED
    Tail lights LED Partial LED
    Daytime lights LED LED
    Mirrors Auto-folding Auto-folding
    Sunroof Standard Standard
    Tailgate Powered Powered
    Wipers Rain-sensing Rain-sensing
    Roof rails No Standard

    Inside there are common features such as heated and ventilated front seats, a powered driver’s seat, dual-zone climate control, proximity key (hands-free) access, and parking sensors front and rear.

    The Mazda has Nappa leather seats compared to the Toyota’s ‘Softex’ synthetic leather designed to be harder-wearing, a powered front-passenger seat, heated back seats, a frameless electro-chromatic rear-view mirror, and a heated steering wheel.

    The Toyota counters with a nifty digital rear-view mirror that uses a rear camera display.

    Mazda CX-5 AkeraToyota RAV4 Edge
    Seat trim Nappa leather Softex synthetic leather
    Driver’s seat functions Heated, ventilated, powered Heated, ventilated, powered
    Passenger seat functions Heated, ventilated, powered Heated, ventilated
    Heated back seats Standard No
    Air-con type Dual-zone climate control Dual-zone climate control
    Rear-view mirror Frameless, auto-dimming Digital via camera
    Heated steering wheel Standard No
    Proximity key Standard Standard
    Parking sensors Front and rear Front and rear

    In terms of tech, both share satellite-navigation, wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Bluetooth and USBs, digital radio, a wireless phone chargers, and a 360-degree camera view.

    The Mazda’s upgraded 10.25-inch screen controlled by a rotary dial atop the transmission tunnel is larger than the Toyota’s 8.0-inch touchscreen, while the CX-5 also has a head-up display and its branded audio system has one extra speaker.

    Mazda CX-5 AkeraToyota RAV4 Edge
    Head-up display Standard No
    Infotainment screen 10.25-inch 8.0-inch
    Sat-nav Standard Standard
    Apple CarPlay Standard Standard
    Android Auto Standard Standard
    Audio system Bose, 10 speakers JBL, 9 speakers
    Bluetooth/USB Standard Standard
    Digital radio Standard Standard
    Wireless charger Standard Standard
    Camera view 360-degree 360-degree

    Are they safe?

    Both the Mazda and Toyota have five-star crash ratings from independent tester ANCAP, with the following results:

    Mazda CX-5

    • Date stamp: 2017
    • Adult occupant protection: 95%
    • Child occupant protection: 80%
    • Pedestrian/cyclist protection: 78%
    • Safety assist features: 59%
    • Crash report: Here

    Toyota RAV4

    • Date stamp: 2019
    • Adult occupant protection: 93%
    • Child occupant protection: 89%
    • Pedestrian/cyclist protection: 85%
    • Safety assist features: 83%
    • Crash report: Here

    Mazda CX-5 AkeraToyota RAV4 Edge
    Airbags Front, front-side, curtain Front, front-side, curtain, driver’s knee
    Child seats 2 x ISOFIX, 3 x top tether 2 x ISOFIX, 3 x top tether
    Autonomous emergency braking Car and vulnerable road user Car and vulnerable road user
    Lane-keeping aid Corrective steering, alerts Corrective steering, alerts
    Blind-spot monitoring Standard Standard
    Rear cross-traffic alert Standard Standard
    Cruise control type Adaptive Adaptive
    Traffic sign readout Standard Standard

    What are they like inside?

    Mazda

    The Mazda gives a more convincing impression of luxury, with its soft Nappa leather seats, tasteful wood inserts, matching brown leather armrest and centre tunnel padding, knurled dials, and flat silver trim inserts. The padded dash also feels very ‘Lexus’.

    Settle into the (heated, ventilated and powered) driver’s seat and you’re presented with a leather-wrapped and tastefully stitched steering wheel with clean and simple buttons, ahead of a cluster with centre speedo TFT that changes colours, and a head-up display on the windscreen showing speed digitally and the current limit.

    The big change is the new, larger centre display running Mazda’s latest operating system from the Mazda 3, CX-30 and other new-gen products. It’s a much cleaner, quicker and more attractive setup than the old CX-5’s dated system with its full-width maps, and is paired to a cracking-good stereo.

    The main user-interface issue is the fact the rather distant centre display doesn’t have touch functionality, meaning you rely on the (unchanged) centre-tunnel rotary dial with shortcut buttons, which doesn’t work well with Android Auto or Apple CarPlay mirroring.

    Storage options comprise a mid-size centre console with two USBs, bottle holders in the door, a felt-lined glovebox, and cupholders with teeth just behind the infotainment controller.

    In terms of cabin space, the CX-5 has never been the roomiest in its class. Open the back doors and you’re presented with a bench comprising two longer-base outboard (heated) seats and a more meagre centre spot impeded by the centre tunnel.

    There’s room for two adults behind two others nevertheless – I’m 194cm and was in work boots, and my knees just touched the seats ahead – and the head space is retained because unlike some other rivals it lacks a panoramic glass roof. But there are similarly sized SUVs out there with more spacious, airy setups.

    There are plenty of back-seat amenities too, beyond the expected rear vents, including a flip-down centre armrest incorporating cupholders, USBs and seat heater buttons. And Mazda doesn’t cut costs by downgrading rear trims, because it all feels about as premium in the back as it does up front.

    The boot is a smaller-than-average 438 litres and is accessed by a powered tailgate. Its flexibility bonafides are enhanced by the clever soft bag cover that moves with the tailgate, and levers in the rear to shortcut-fold the 40:20:40 rear bench seat for longer items.

    Toyota

    The RAV4 imparts a chunkier, bolder, and brighter look, and trades the premium-looking materials for lower-maintenance stuff, exemplified by the synthetic leather seats with orange piping and good bolstering.

    The bright orange theme continues throughout, incorporating the stitch-work, and various plastic inlays in and around storage areas. I like the chunky rubberised ventilation controls, knurled and illuminated drive mode selector, and relative lack of glossy black trim. Rare…

    Behind the leather-wrapped wheel with its (again) nicely damped buttons is a medley digital and analogue cluster with a few extra menus and animations, but no HUD like the Mazda. 

    The touchscreen is more CarPlay/Android-friendly, but it’s otherwise an inferior system to the Mazda’s – in terms of size, resolution, input processing and usability. Fine for a Corolla, but it feels like a $50,000-plus SUV should offer something a little swisher. 

    Extra storage includes a signature open section ahead of the front passenger, and a slightly more capacious console. It also has a bonus digital rear-view mirror which is handy if you have a full boot or three rear passengers.

    The back seats offer vents, USBs and cupholders, and the floor is mostly flat meaning better foot placement for rear-centre occupants thanks to the use of two-motor AWD. Legroom, foot-room and headroom is superior for taller occupants, and it feels airier. 

    Boot capacity measures a more substantive 580L litres with five seats in use and the two-height floor at its lower setting. The tailgate is powered, but there are no levers in the boot to swiftly fold the middle seats.

    In essence, the Toyota’s is brighter, brasher and roomier, whereas the Mazda’s is a more premium experience with superior tech. if you have destructive kids, then just quietly I’d be worried about them scuffing up that lovely CX-5…

    Just a reminder to be sure to watch the video embedded higher up the story, in which Paul gives a visual breakdown of the respective interiors.

    Mazda CX-5 AkeraToyota RAV4 Edge
    Length 4575mm 4615mm
    Width 1845mm 1865mm
    Height 1680mm 1690mm
    Wheelbase 2700mm 2690mm
    Clearance 200mm 195mm
    Boot 438L 580L

    What’s under the bonnet?

    Mazda

    The CX-5 can be had with a cheaper naturally aspirated 2.5-litre petrol and a more efficient 2.2-litre twin-turbo diesel, but the engine option Mazda loaned us was the 2.5-litre turbo-petrol.

    It pushes out a potent (for the segment) 170kW of power and a diesel-like 420Nm of torque through an on-demand all-wheel drive (AWD) system and six-speed automatic transmission.

    It can tow 2000kg and uses a claimed 8.2 litres of fuel per 100km.

    Toyota

    The RAV4 Edge comes with a 2.5-litre naturally aspirated engine option but the vast majority of buyers go for the hybrid, which is a real unique selling point in these times of mega fuel prices.

    The Toyota’s drivetrain pairs a 2.5-litre petrol running the leaner Atkinson cycle, paired with a 88kW and 202Nm front motor-generator and 40kW and 121Nm rear motor-generator, plus a small battery charged by the engine and brake-energy recuperation.

    It uses an e-CVT transmission and the AWD system uses the rear axle motor. Nifty. It can tow 1500kg and uses a crazy-good 4.8L/100km using 91 RON on the ADR combined cycle.

    Mazda CX-5 AkeraToyota RAV4 Edge
    Engine 2.5-litre, 4-cyl, turbo 2.5-litre, 4-cyl
    Electric motor/s NA Front and rear
    Power 170kW @ 5000rpm 163kW
    Torque 420Nm @ 2000rpm No total listed
    CE’s 0-100km/h 7.52sec 8.32sec
    Fuel economy 8.2L/100km 4.8L/100km
    Fuel required 91 RON petrol 91 RON petrol
    Transmission 6-speed automatic e-CVT
    Driven wheels Driveline AWD Two-motor AWD
    Towing capacity 2000kg 1500kg
    Kerb weight 1730kg 1760kg

Is Mazda CX

Overall Reliability Rating The severity and frequency of repairs are both much lower than other vehicles, so the RAV4 is one of the more reliable vehicles on the road. The Mazda CX-5 Reliability Rating is 4.5 out of 5.0, which ranks it 1st out of 26 for midsize SUVs.

Is CX

Conclusion. The Toyota RAV4 is more practical and family-friendly, thanks to its bigger interior and better fuel economy. However, the Mazda CX-5 is the more stylish and athletic choice, especially with its available turbo engine.

Is the RAV4 2022 Noisy?

Despite being a recently redesigned model, the 2022 Toyota RAV4 is well-known for having a raucous-sounding engine. Consumer Reports described it as having more engine noise than competitors and not enough insulation to cancel out the wind and road noise.

Is Mazda redesigning the CX

2022 Mazda CX-5 Redesign: Mechanical Elements Drivers may also notice the Turbo trim level, which is a renamed version of the Grand Touring Reserve, and the updated Signature trim body colors. Lastly, the engine horsepower has increased to 256 hp with premium fuel.