Samsung galaxy class action lawsuit illinois

A proposed class action alleges Samsung Electronics America has violated a novel Illinois privacy law by automatically collecting, capturing, storing and using without consent the facial scans of individuals who appear in photos stored on Samsung devices in the state. 

The 22-page case claims Samsung has run afoul of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), a state law that requires private entities who deal in consumers’ biometric information, i.e., fingerprints and retinal and facial scans, to obtain informed written consent and provide requisite data retention and destruction disclosures. 

Per the complaint, Samsung has collected, captured, stored and used through its pre-installed Gallery App the biometrics of “millions of unwitting Illinois residents”—users, non-users and minors alike—who appear in photos stored on Samsung devices without first providing notice, obtaining informed written consent, or publishing retention or destruction disclosures. 

The case more specifically claims Samsung, through its Gallery App, creates face templates using sophisticated facial recognition technology that analyzes and extracts the points and contours of the faces that appear in photos stored on Samsung devices. Each facial template constitutes a “biometric identifier,” the suit says. 

“All of this occurs automatically through a ‘background’ process in the Gallery App, without the knowledge or informed written consent of the user, let alone anyone else who appears in the photographs stored on Samsung Devices,” the lawsuit alleges, stating that Samsung’s Gallery App cannot be removed or modified by a device user. 

Per the case, Samsung’s Gallery App uses facial templates to organize and sort photos based on who appears in each image. This is done by comparing the face templates of individuals who appear in newly-stored photos against those already saved in the facial database, the complaint says. If there’s a match, the Gallery App will group newly-uploaded photos with previous photos depicting the same individual, the lawsuit states. 

According to the suit, Samsung users cannot disable this feature, prevent Samsung from “harvesting” biometric identifiers or opt out of the process. Moreover, modifying or altering Samsung’s software so as to disable facial recognition is prohibited by the company’s end user licensing agreements, per the case. 

Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.

Are you a Samsung Galaxy Phone or Tablet User?

Samsung galaxy class action lawsuit illinois

Samsung Biometric Privacy Case

Earlier in 2022, electronics giant Samsung faced several accusations of having collected and stored facial scans of Galaxy phone and tablet users without their knowledge and consent. If these allegations are true, Samsung’s actions would amount to a clear violation of its users’ privacy. As a result, a growing number of people are signing up to join a Samsung biometric privacy class action.

Privacy violation allegations

Allegations first arose in Illinois, where Samsung was accused of having violated the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). For reasons the company has not yet explained, it appears that it has been running a sophisticated facial recognition technology in the background of its Gallery app to create face templates, without the customer’s consent – not to mention any other people who may be in the photographs.  

Facial features are unique to every individual, much like fingerprints, which means they fall under the banner of biometric data. Biometric data is protected by Illinois’s BIPA law. The law stipulates that companies may collect this data, but only after taking certain steps and with the user’s full knowledge and consent. Samsung appears to have flagrantly contravened this law. As other users across the country also start to make claims against the company, the electronics company’s actions clearly violate similar laws in other states as well.

Samsung biometric privacy lawsuit or arbitration?

Although at least one class-action lawsuit has now been filed against Samsung, the company has argued that customers cannot sue over this or any other matter. The reason for this is that customers agree to arbitrate any claims that might arise against the company when they purchase and set up their devices. As a result, attorneys are handling the matter on a mass arbitration basis.

Arbitration involves the settlement of a dispute without taking the matter to court. No judge or jury is involved. Instead, a third-party arbitrator is called upon to decide the case. Owners of Samsung Galaxy phones and tablets now have an opportunity to contact a class action lawyer and potentially join a mass arbitration against Samsung. At this stage, there are no guarantees, and the class action is still developing, but customers who sign up for the class action could potentially be entitled to as much as $5,000 in damages.  

Samsung Biometric Privacy FAQ’s

Is Samsung facing a Class Action or Mass Arbitration lawsuit?

Samsung has argued in the case, however, that consumers cannot bring a class action lawsuit over the alleged biometric violations because they agreed to arbitrate any claims against the company when they purchased and set up their devices. This is why Shamis & Gentile, P.A. have decided to handle the matter on a “mass arbitration” basis.

What is Mass Arbitration?

Mass arbitration involves groups of workers or consumers initiating arbitration claims against the same company simultaneously. This can trigger the defendants’ obligation to pay fees and costs for each individual claim.

Why file a Mass Arbitration lawsuit vs. class action lawsuit?

Big corporations and companies may have arbitration clauses. While arbitration clauses bar you from joining together with other employees or consumers to mount class-action lawsuits, mass arbitration can be a way to still gain an advantage on a large group scale and give you negotiating power.

About Shamis & Gentile

Shamis & Gentile, P.A. provides outstanding legal services in Florida and New York. We distinguish ourselves because of our experience and resources, which we combine to handle any kind of case involving personal injury, personal injury protection, class actions/mass tort, and contract disputes. When you bring your case to Shamis & Gentile, P.A., you will always work with a seasoned attorney who has an excellent track record. We are progressive and trusted within the legal community and we are often called upon to settle cases that other law firms may not be able to handle on their own. If you are a Samsung mobile phone user and you believe your privacy has been violated, you may be eligible to join a Samsung biometric privacy mass arbitration action. Contact us today to discuss your case.

How much is Snapchat settlement in Illinois?

Snap, Inc, parent company of popular social media platform Snapchat, reached a settlement to pay out $35 million to Illinois users for violation of the state's biometric privacy law.

What is snap settlement?

Snap, the parent company of Snapchat, has reached a $35 million settlement in a class action lawsuit in Illinois. The suit alleges that Snapchat's filters and lenses violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which is a powerful state measure that has tripped up tech companies in recent years.

How do I know if I filled out a lawsuit on Facebook?

If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can get free help on this website or by calling the Settlement Administrator at 1-844-799-2417. Please do not contact the Court or Facebook. Facebook will pay $650 million to settle this case.

How do I get my money from Facebook lawsuit?

The lawsuit is known as Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation. Meta denies that it violated any law but has agreed to the settlement to avoid the costs and risks associated with continuing the case. To receive a payment from the settlement, you need to submit a claim form by September 22, 2022.