What happens when you die on impact

There's a fairly common belief that if you happen to fall from a great height, you'll be "dead before you hit the ground". The reasons given probably stem from fear of your imminent death, or a generalised terror, leading to shock, heart attack, or even asphyxiation. On one hand, it is kind of reassuring to believe that you won't feel any pain if you fall from a great height. The reality is that it's the huge deceleration (as you suddenly stop) that kills you.

It's really hard to die while you are in "free fall", ie, falling freely through the atmosphere. One scenario in which you can die in free fall is that you are so high up (say above 100,000 feet or about 30 km) that the intense cold and lack of oxygen will kill. But even this scenario can be survived. On August 16, 1960, US Air Force Captain Joe Kittinger rode a helium balloon to 102,800 feet. The temperature was -79°C. It turns out that the air pressure is low enough at 62,000 feet to have boiled the water in his blood - and at 102,800 feet, the air pressure is actually a lot lower. He was kept warm by many layers of warm clothing. He was kept alive by the thin newly developed MC3 pressure suit covering his entire body, and a tank strapped to his body feeding him pure oxygen to breathe.

He jumped out of his open gondola, and began falling. By 90,000 feet, he had reached about 1,149 km/hr - faster than the speed of sound. He fell in free fall for about four-and-a-half minutes. His speed gradually reduced to around 200 km/hr as he dropped though the increasingly-thicker air. His parachute opened around 14,000 feet. There was a sudden jerk as his speed suddenly dropped to around 21 kph. He landed about 12 minutes later, with no permanent injuries. He still holds two records - the only person to break the sound barrier without being in a craft, and the highest parachute jump.

The important thing to realise from this tale is that the act of falling freely does not kill you. You might become so terrified as you fall (which sounds very reasonable to me) that you might psychologically "freeze" and become unaware of your environment, but the actual fall does not kill you.

On the other hand, if you stop suddenly from 200 km/hr over a distance of a few centimetres, everything in your body effectively weighs 7,500 times more than normal. Your 1.5 kg brain briefly weighs 10 tonnes. In that brief instant, cells are burst open and blood vessels are torn asunder. The aorta (the huge main artery coming out of the heart) will usually rip loose from the heart. For a few beats, your heart continues to pump blood into the space around the heart and lungs, while no blood goes to your brain. But most of the blood vessels in your brain have also instantaneously torn loose. After that brief instant, your "weight" returns to normal - but blood is now eating its way through your irreparably damaged brain. This is what medical people mean to when they refer to "massive internal bleeding".

There was a case of a parachutist who survived a fall (with broken limbs) when her parachute did not open. But the ground was very soft, and according to the fire officer, "She left a good 12 inch hole into the ground".

In general, most fit humans can just barely survive a sudden deceleration of about 40 G. In a "typical" car crash at around 100 kph, the people inside can probably survive, if they are wearing seat belts. The crush zone of the car is about 1.2 metres - that's by how much the car shrinks. The airbag and/or seatbelt slow you down over another 0.4 metres. If the deceleration was even (which it is not), the victims would suffer decelerations of around 25 - 30 G. But the deceleration is usually not uniform, so there are very brief peak decelerations of 40 - 60 G.

There are no decelerations in free fall. But it's not the fall that kills you - it's the Big Crunch at the end that brings you to a dead stop.

Tags: forensic-science, pseudoscience, weird-and-wonderful

^ to top

Published 13 September 2005

© 2022 Karl S. Kruszelnicki Pty Ltd

Email ABC Science

  • Share this moment
  • Email a friend

Use these social-bookmarking links to share Dead before you hit the ground.

  • Tweet

Use this form to email 'Dead before you hit the ground' to someone you know:
https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/09/13/1459026.htm?

RecipientFriend's name Friend's emailSenderYour name Your email[an error occurred while processing this directive]   Get New ImageEnter CaptchaEmail to friend

By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message.

From the Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, Dallas, Texas.

What happens when you die on impact
Corresponding author.

Corresponding author: Corresponding author: Shahid Shafi, MD, MPH, Baylor Health Care System, 1600 W. College Street, Suite LL 10, Grapevine, TX 76052 (e-mail: [email protected]).

Copyright © 2013, Baylor University Medical Center

Abstract

Currently, long-term outcomes are significant because health care system changes will likely lead to a single payment for each occurrence of care, including readmissions—the “bundled payment” system. Therefore, it is essential to understand the outcomes of trauma patients discharged alive from trauma centers. This article reviews the current knowledge base on the timing and causes of deaths after trauma. The trimodal mortality model (immediate deaths, early deaths, and late deaths) is utilized as the early research describing trimodal distribution is discussed. Also covered is the successive work as trauma systems matured, showing a shift toward a bimodal distribution with a decline in late deaths. Finally, studies of long-term outcomes are highlighted. Deaths occurring within minutes or a few hours of injury are largely unchanged, which underscores the enormity of injuries to the central nervous and cardiovascular systems. Late deaths caused by multiple organ failure and sepsis have declined considerably, however. Also, the causes of death in this patient population remain constant. Lastly, a considerable number of deaths after discharge may be due to nontraumatic causes.

Survival to discharge has long been the primary endpoint for research and quality improvement in trauma (1, 2). More recent studies have begun assessing long-term outcomes such as complications, costs, readmissions, and survival after discharge (3–11). We have recently shown that over a period of 1 year after the initial injury, about half of the deaths occur within the first 30 days but the rest occur afterward (12). It is important to understand the outcomes of trauma patients discharged alive from trauma centers. Baker et al and Trunkey defined timing of trauma deaths as a trimodal distribution in urban environments in the United States (13, 14). However, the development and maturation of regionalized trauma networks in the 1970s and 1980s have shifted the epidemiology of trauma patients and patterns of mortality. Subsequent research has shown a decline in deaths late after trauma, indicating that the trimodal concept may no longer be accurate in urban trauma environments (12, 15–18). A confounding factor is inconsistent time intervals chosen by researchers to define the timing of deaths (18–20). Herein, we review the existing knowledge on timing and causes of deaths after trauma. We use the trimodal mortality model to cover the early research describing the trimodal distribution, the subsequent work as trauma systems matured, and studies of long-term outcomes.

TIMING OF DEATHS

The first peak in the classic trimodal model of trauma mortality is immediate death occurring within minutes of the injury. These patients are declared dead on the scene or die shortly after arrival to the hospital. In most published reports, these include deaths at the scene, deaths occurring within 1 hour of arrival to the hospital, and all deaths in the emergency department. These deaths are generally a consequence of severe and likely nonsurvivable injuries. The seminal works of Baker et al and Trunkey in the 1970s showed that 64% and 53%, respectively, of trauma deaths occurred on the scene, with the patients not even transported to a hospital (13, 14). Figure Figure11 displays a summary of studies evaluating immediate deaths (12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21–24). This recognition led to rapid development of regionalized trauma systems in the United States, led by the work of Dr. Cowley in Maryland (25, 26). The primary purpose of regionalized integrated care was rapid transportation of patients from the scene to definitive care. It is interesting to note in Figure Figure11 that despite all the progress in emergency medical services and trauma systems, prehospital care, injury prevention, and automotive safety, the proportion of deaths occurring immediately after injury has remained unchanged over time, at 50% to 60%.

What happens when you die on impact

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Studies reviewing immediate deaths (12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21–24).

The second peak in the trimodal distribution is early deaths, defined as deaths within hours of arrival to the hospital. In most published reports, early deaths include deaths within 24 hours of arrival to a trauma center, excluding immediate deaths. These deaths are also a consequence of severe injuries, but the patients arrive at the hospital alive and are potentially treatable with prompt definitive care. Trunkey estimated this group to include approximately 30% of deaths (14). Figure Figure22 depicts a range of studies evaluating early deaths (12, 13, 15, 16, 19). Again, the proportion of deaths in this group has remained relatively unchanged over time, at 25% to 30% of all trauma deaths.

What happens when you die on impact

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Studies reviewing early deaths (12, 13, 15, 16, 19).

In Trunkey's original description of the trimodal distribution, 20% of trauma deaths were “late deaths,” defined as those occurring days to weeks after the injury among patients who survived the initial insult (14). In most reports, this category includes deaths occurring after the first 24 hours and all other in-hospital deaths. Figure Figure33 displays studies evaluating late deaths (12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 22–24). In contrast to the first two categories, there has been a definite and dramatic drop in late deaths over time. In the most recent study by Gunst and colleagues, this group included only 9% of deaths (12).

What happens when you die on impact

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Studies reviewing late deaths (12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 22–24).

Deaths among trauma patients after discharge have largely remained overlooked in the trauma literature. This is due in large part to the difficulty of follow-up in the trauma patient population. First, regionalized trauma networks often mean that patients are transported farther from home for their initial episode of care at designated trauma centers. Second, trauma patients are typically younger individuals who are more mobile in pursuit of work or education. However, several studies have shown that trauma patients have an increased risk of mortality after discharge. Follow-up methods have varied, but the most commonly used are trauma registries, hospital databases, and patient records from single institutions. Combined with a lack of communication between medical record systems, single-institution studies are likely to miss patients who pursue follow-up care closer to home at a different hospital. In order to capture higher percentages of the study population, particularly over longer periods of time, telephone interviews or mail surveys are commonly utilized. More recently, trauma researchers have employed vital statistics records and Social Security data as a means of capturing high percentages of patients while also obtaining cause-of-death data (27–29).

In a study of data from 1991 to 1993, Mullins et al reported an in-hospital mortality rate of 12.1 per 100,000 for trauma deaths. This increased to 14.1 per 100,000 when including patients who died within 30 days of discharge (30). Among injured Medicare patients discharged to home, the 30-day mortality ranged from 1.9% to 2.3% (31). In 2004, Clark and colleagues reported that among injured Medicare patients, 30-day mortality was 7.5% compared with 3.7% in-hospital mortality (6). In 2006, MacKenzie et al reported a case fatality rate for in-hospital deaths of 7.6%, which remained stable for 30 days but increased to 10.4% at 1 year (32). In 2008, Gorra et al reported 30-day mortality rates of 4.2% to 5.4% among injured Medicare patients discharged to a long-term care facility (31). A 2010 study by Claridge and colleagues reported a mortality rate of 3.6% at 30 days, 4.1% at 90 days, 5.5% at 1 year, and 8.1% over the entire study period (33). In 2011, Davidson et al demonstrated 9.8% mortality at 1 year and 16% 3-year cumulative mortality (34). The multiinstitutional prospective National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma evaluated patients up to 1 year after discharge. In this study, MacKenzie et al reported an in-hospital mortality rate of 21.3%, but a further 2.6% were dead at 3 months, and an additional 2.2% were dead by 12 months (35). Similarly, in 2005, Wright and colleagues reported a 5-year mortality rate of 22.1% in trauma patients admitted to an intensive care unit during their initial hospitalization (36). In 2011, Timmers et al reported a 1-year mortality rate of 17%, which increased to 29% between 6 and 11 years (37). Finally, our recently published study utilizing Social Security data showed that almost half of the deaths in trauma patients occurred after discharge from the trauma center (27). All these studies are consistent in their findings that the risk of death among trauma patients remains elevated for months to years afterward.

CAUSES OF DEATH

Several studies have investigated the causes of death in trauma patients. Baker et al found that brain injury accounted for a majority of deaths, at 50% (13). Heart or aortic injury (17%), hemorrhage (12%), sepsis (10%), lung injury (6%), burn (3%), and liver injury (2%) accounted for the remainder. The majority of patients with major cardiac, vascular, or liver injury died of hemorrhage. Shackford and colleagues also found that head injury was the most common cause of death, and when combined with spinal cord injury, neurologic injuries were responsible for 49% of deaths (24). On autopsy, secondary brain injury, defined as diffuse cerebral edema; herniation; or cerebral necrosis due to hypoxia, hypotension, or cerebral edema that followed the primary injury was present in just over half of neurotrauma cases. Almost a third (31%) of victims died of hemorrhage in the chest, the abdomen, or both cavities. Other causes of death included asphyxia in 6%, cardiac arrest in 4%, sepsis in 3%, and pneumonia in 2%. The Table lists the most common causes of death for each time interval. Immediate and early deaths are considered together, given the similar etiologies.

In Trunkey and Lim's initial case series in 1972, 45% of the patients in the immediate death category died of irreversible brain injury, such as lacerations of the brain, brain stem, or spinal cord, and 35% died due to hemorrhage resulting from injuries to the heart, aorta, liver, lungs, and pelvic fractures (21). Similarly, Meislin et al showed that for death within 1 hour of injury, 46% were neurologic injuries and 31% were due to circulatory collapse resulting from hemorrhage (19). Likewise, work from Sauaia et al showed that among those dead on the scene, 42% died from central nervous system injuries, 39% from exsanguination, and 7% from organ failure (18). These studies are consistent in reporting that the two most common causes of immediate deaths are head injuries and hemorrhage.

The cause of early trauma deaths is similar to that of immediate deaths and likely represents less catastrophic injuries or better prehospital care and shorter transport times to trauma centers. As described by Trunkey and Lim, the causes of death in this group include major internal hemorrhages of the head, respiratory system, or abdominal organs or multiple minor injuries resulting in severe blood loss (21). Sauaia et al reported that among trauma deaths within 48 hours of injury, exsanguination was the most common cause (51%) due to injuries to the liver, heart, or major blood vessels (7). This was particularly true for patients with penetrating injuries. Central nervous system injury was the second most common cause of death, including brain lacerations, contusions, and subdural hemorrhages (18). Meislin et al showed that neurologic injuries and circulatory collapse or hemorrhage accounted for over 80% of early deaths (19). Baker and colleagues showed that most of the deaths due to head injuries were within the first 2 days after injury (13).

Trunkey reported that 80% of late deaths in the hospital were due to infections or multiple organ failure (14). Similarly, Baker found that 78% of deaths after 7 days were due to sepsis and multiple organ failure (13). Cowley indicated that the most common causes of death in this group were overwhelming infection and irreversible head injuries (26). Sauaia et al reported that for deaths occurring after 1 week postinjury, organ failure claimed the majority of patients (61%) (18). More recently, Meislin et al reported that for the group dying within 24 to 48 hours, 45% died of neurologic injury, 42% of circulatory collapse or hemorrhage, and 9% of multiple organ failure (19). Similarly, for the group dying 2 days to 3 weeks after injury, 48% died of neurologic injury, 35% of circulatory collapse or hemorrhage, and 16% of multiple organ failure. These studies indicate that head injuries and hemorrhage remain important causes of death among patients who survive the first 24 hours, but multiple organ failure becomes more prominent with the passage of time.

Causes of death after discharge from trauma centers are less well studied. This is due, in part, to the difficulties of follow-up. Mullins evaluated cause-of-death codes reported on death certificates for injured patients who died of nontraumatic causes during their hospital stay and within 30 days after discharge (30). Of 1174 postdischarge deaths, 15% were due to neoplasms, 12% to cerebrovascular disease, 11% to cardiovascular disease, 11% to ischemic heart disease, 9% to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 8% to acute myocardial infarction. Another 20% were due to a myriad of other causes. In a German study, Probst and colleagues described in-hospital and postdischarge causes of death for trauma patients (38). While in-hospital causes of death mirrored those previously discussed, postdischarge deaths included cardiovascular disease in 23%, a second major trauma in 19%, neurologic disease in 16%, suicide in 10%, and malignancies in 6%. Furthermore, trauma patients had increased mortality compared with the general population during the first year after injury. The mortality rates were more closely approximated during years 2 to 10 after injury. Claridge and colleagues classified deaths as trauma related in 33%, possibly related in 23%, and unrelated in 44% (33). Additionally, mortality after discharge was more likely trauma related in younger patients. The authors found that most deaths within the first year after injury were attributable to trauma, after which chronic diseases increased mortality. These studies indicate that postdischarge deaths among trauma patients are related to common chronic diseases within the population. However, the impact of injuries on the outcome of these chronic diseases remains unknown.

CONCLUSION

Three important conclusions can be drawn from this review. First, deaths occurring within minutes or a few hours of injury are largely unchanged, reflecting the devastating nature of injures to the central nervous and cardiovascular systems. Late deaths due to multiple organ failure and sepsis, however, have declined dramatically. Second, the causes of death in this patient population, i.e., those with severe head injuries and hemorrhage, remain persistent. Finally, a large number of deaths in trauma patients that occur after discharge may be related to nontraumatic causes. Reasons for the increased risk of death from nontraumatic causes after discharge need to be studied further.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Kelli R. Trungale, MLS, ELS, for editorial assistance.

Table

Causes of death by timing category

Immediate and early deathsLate deathsPostdischargeBrain injuryInfectionCardiovascular diseaseHemorrhageMultiple-organ failureSecond major traumaBrain injuryNeurologic diseaseHemorrhageMalignancy

Open in a separate window

References

1. Hemmila MR, Nathens AB, Shafi S, Calland JF, Clark DE, Cryer HG, Goble S, Hoeft CJ, Meredith JW, Neal ML, Pasquale MD, Pomphrey MD, Fildes JJ. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility. J Trauma. 2010;68(2):253–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Shafi S, Nathens AB, Cryer HG, Hemmila MR, Pasquale MD, Clark DE, Neal M, Goble S, Meredith JW, Fildes JJ. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(4):521–530. e521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Battistella FD, Torabian SZ, Siadatan KM. Hospital readmission after trauma: an analysis of outpatient complications. J Trauma. 1997;42(6):1012–1016. discussion 1016–1017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kirshblum S, McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1757–1763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Miller M, Hsu GM, Seel RT, Englander J, High WM, Jr, Zafonte R. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(1):85–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Clark DE, DeLorenzo MA, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE. Epidemiology and short-term outcomes of injured Medicare patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(12):2023–2030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418–1428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ladha KS, Young JH, Ng DK, Efron DT, Haider AH. Factors affecting the likelihood of presentation to the emergency department of trauma patients after discharge. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(5):431–437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Malhotra AK, Martin N, Jacoby M, Tarrant J, Guilford K, Wolfe LG, Aboutanos MB, Duane TM, Ivatury RR. What are we missing: results of a 13-month active follow-up program at a level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2009;66(6):1696–1702. discussion 1702–1703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Masini BD, Owens BD, Hsu JR, Wenke JC. Rehospitalization after combat injury. J Trauma. 2011;71(1 Suppl):S98–S102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Morris DS, Rohrbach J, Rogers M, Thanka Sundaram LM, Sonnad S, Pascual J, Sarani B, Reilly P, Sims C. The surgical revolving door: risk factors for hospital readmission. J Surg Res. 2011;170(2):297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Gunst M, Ghaemmaghami V, Gruszecki A, Urban J, Frankel H, Shafi S. Changing epidemiology of trauma deaths leads to a bimodal distribution. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2010;23(4):349–354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Baker CC, Oppenheimer L, Stephens B, Lewis FR, Trunkey DD. Epidemiology of trauma deaths. Am J Surg. 1980;140(1):144–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Trunkey DD. Trauma. Accidental and intentional injuries account for more years of life lost in the U.S. than cancer and heart disease. Among the prescribed remedies are improved preventive efforts, speedier surgery and further research. Sci Am. 1983;249(2):28–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Demetriades D, Kimbrell B, Salim A, Velmahos G, Rhee P, Preston C, Gruzinski G, Chan L. Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: is “trimodal” distribution a valid concept? J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(3):343–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Demetriades D, Murray J, Charalambides K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Rhee P, Chan L. Trauma fatalities: time and location of hospital deaths. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(1):20–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Pang JM, Civil I, Ng A, Adams D, Koelmeyer T. Is the trimodal pattern of death after trauma a dated concept in the 21st century? Trauma deaths in Auckland 2004. Injury. 2008;39(1):102–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, Moser KS, Brennan R, Read RA, Pons PT. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma. 1995;38(2):185–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Meislin H, Criss EA, Judkins D, Berger R, Conroy C, Parks B, Spaite DW, Valenzuela TD. Fatal trauma: the modal distribution of time to death is a function of patient demographics and regional resources. J Trauma. 1997;43(3):433–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Bamvita JM, Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Ratte S, Clas D. The impact of premorbid conditions on temporal pattern and location of adult blunt trauma hospital deaths. J Trauma. 2007;63(1):135–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Analysis of 425 consecutive trauma fatalities: an autopsy study. J Am Coll Emerg Phys. 1974;3(6):368–371. [Google Scholar]

22. Potenza BM, Hoyt DB, Coimbra R, Fortlage D, Holbrook T, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P. The epidemiology of serious and fatal injury in San Diego County over an 11-year period. J Trauma. 2004;56(1):68–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Hedegaard HB, Meng K. Epidemiology of urban trauma deaths: a comprehensive reassessment 10 years later. World J Surg. 2007;31(7):1507–1511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Shackford SR, Mackersie RC, Holbrook TL, Davis JW, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Hoyt DB, Wolf PL. The epidemiology of traumatic death. A population-based analysis. Arch Surg. 1993;128(5):571–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Cowley RA. A total emergency medical system for the State of Maryland. Md State Med J. 1975;24(7):37–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Cowley RA. The resuscitation and stabilization of major multiple trauma patients in a trauma center environment. Clin Med. 1976;83(1):16–22. [Google Scholar]

27. Shafi S, Renfro LA, Barnes S, Rayan N, Gentilello LM, Fleming N, Ballard D. Chronic consequences of acute injuries: worse survival after discharge. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):699–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Social Security Death Master File. 2011. Available at http://www.ssdmf.com/FolderID/1/SessionID/%7B1764C2FE-6072-4653-A9C4-C217E454B2A7%7D/PageVars/Library/InfoManage/Guide.htm; accessed October 23, 2012.

Do people feel pain when they die on impact?

From my experience in both emergency and hospice settings, I can say that most people do experience pain during death during injury and illness processes.

How fast do you have to go to die on impact in a car crash?

When a car is going slowly, the risk of serious injury is about 1%. At 50 mph, the risk increases to 69% for injury and the risk for serious injury increases to 52%. A fatal car accident is practically inevitable at speeds of 70 mph or more.